Advocates dissociated themselves from any responsibility repressors
At the last hearing prior to sentencing, the defense of Alfredo Manuel Arrillaga, Justo Ortiz and Ignacio Roberto Luis Pertusio requested their acquittal and immediate revocation of home detention. They also asked for the annulment of all incriminating statements of the parties but the court ruled.
As they did throughout the process, public defenders and Paula Daniel Vázquez Susana Muniagurria again highlight the rejection the validity of the testimonies that were provided under the truth trials and were incorporated as evidence in this case during the investigation stage.
focused strategy to discredit witnesses, including some victims who suffered all sorts of torment at the Naval Base Mar del Plata, discard the validity of others and detach any responsibility in the crimes with which he against the three repressors claiming that "no facts have been established."
For Arrillaga, attorney Carlos Meira said, "has been established that my client is totally alien to the two facts against him," and added that "we have to ask why is the cause of the Naval Base, in response to the prosecutor's allegations and complaints Daniel Adler who claimed that the Navy responded to the command of the army, a force for which the defendant was head of tasks.
Before exposure of the defenses, Meira had asked for the invalidate all accusatory allegations on the grounds that "violation of the standards of oral because they are limited to read point by point." The court composed of judges Jarazo Nelson, and Jorge Alejandro Esmoris Micheli refused the request to determine that it was inconsistent.
Earlier Cesare Sivo plaintiff attorney had stated that "in addition to inappropriate (the defender's claim) is a bad faith that must be punished."
0 comments:
Post a Comment